Even though putting aging under medical control is probably desirable by most humans, this concept is not always clear to everybody.
One of our goals is to use this competition as a vehicle to clarify and demystify some of the misconceptions we hear very often.
You can choose just one or all of them and explain them in any way you choose, using your own language and ideas.
“Aging and disease are two separate things”
— Aging causes disease and it should be treated as one —
As we age we lose our health. We cannot age and become elderly without eventually getting ill as a result of it. If we live long enough we will all get sick of one or several of the diseases of aging and eventually sucumb to them. When we talk about eliminating aging, we talk about putting this process under medical control so that we don’t have to get sick as we age.
“If I live to a 150 I will be living for a long time in an old sick body”
— If these new therapies help us live to a 150, it will only be cause they will keep us
strong and healthy —
When we talk about extending our lifespan, we are talking about extending our health. The extension of our life will not happen unless we fix the health problems that come with aging. Once we do this, more longevity will happen as a “side benefit” of being healthier. As we said before, we get sick with aging, and that’s why most of humans die of old age.
So, if we will still be alive at 150, this will mean we will have a better control of the aging process through medical interventions, hence; we should not be living in an old sick body.
“Aging is natural and we shouldn’t tamper with natural”
— Combating aging is a great challenge for Humanity and we have a long history of
getting great benefit from tampering with many natural things —
It is proven that there are endless ‘unnatural’ things created by humans of enormous value and positive outcome, and we can imagine only a miniscule number of people who would choose to live without them — especially when it has to do with suffering, disease and death.
A few examples of unnatural things we use all the time without questioning much are: pacemakers, antibiotics (to kill a natural bacteria), pain killers, cochlear implants, dialysis, plastic surgery, airplanes (it is not natural for us to fly), hair color, prosthetic limbs, contact lenses, birth control methods and the list goes forever.
On the other hand, here are some natural things that are definitely bad for us: earthquakes, hurricanes, mudslides, tornadoes, infectious microorganisms, poisonous plants, predators, venomous creatures, fire, gravity, tsunamis, radiation, meteor impacts, etc., etc.
It is time to reason and understand that natural doesn’t necessarily mean good.
“These therapies will only be for the rich”
— Healthy longevity therapies are being developed for everybody to access —
Rejuvenation therapies could be as little reserved for rich people as mobile phones, cars, electricity or vaccination may have been in the beginning. Like for most technological progress, the research may be complicated and expensive, but once the technology becomes available it will become available for everybody. One good example is that The first Human Genome took $2.7 billion dollars and almost 15 years to complete. In 2001 the price of sequencing a Genome was 100 Million Dollars, today is under 1000 Dollars and it will keep going down without a doubt. Humanity has never stopped advancing cause it was harder and less cost effective in the beginning, if we had thought like that, we would probably not have most of the technology that is available for everybody today. That’s one more reason why it’s so important not to delay the development of these cures.
- Concept of film: The submitted piece should show that medical progress for a healthier and longer life is generally a good thing for citizens and society alike. You will achieve this by using the list of common misconceptions provided in the guideliness section. You must choose at least one and can also choose all of them.
- Length: The length of the film should be a minimum of 1 minute and a maximum of 20 minutes.
- Visual art style: All kinds of visuals are allowed:
Films, computer animations, whiteboard drawings, live action, infographic, stop and motion, cartoons, typography, screencast, etc.
- Genre: All genres are allowed. Science, fiction or science-fiction, a story, sad or funny, a docufiction, a documentary, etc.
- Copyright: All material used in the video should be original or you should own the copyright for it. You cannot use copyrighted material for which you don’t have the rights. If you fail to follow this rule your film will be automatically disqualified.
- Submission: The submission deadline is 23:59 GMT September 15, 2018. The final work should be uploaded to the internet and a link to watch it should be provided to us via email at [email protected]ongevityfilmcompetition.com, together with your last name, first name and the proposed title of the work. The winners will be announced October 1st (International Longevity Day).
- Language: The official language is English. Videos can also be submitted in French, Spanish, Italian, German, Russian and Dutch but would need to have English subtitles.
- Work Originality and Permissions: a) Films must be the original work of the applicants and they must be unpublished before July 1st, 2018. b) If a film is based upon another person’s life or upon a book or other underlying work, applicant(s) must secure any necessary rights to make such adaptations. c) By entering the competition, you represent that you have secured all necessary rights. d) Applicants are solely responsible for obtaining all necessary rights and permissions for third-party materials included in their films, including but not limited to music, trademarks, logos, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights. e) Longevity Film Competition (LFC) expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility for any violations of the foregoing. f) If your submission is selected for a prize, you agree that SENS Research Foundation (SRF), The Healthy Life Extension Society (Heales) and the International Longevity Alliance (ILA) use your movie without restriction to promote the mission of curing the diseases of aging. SRF, Heales and the ILA can show your work on the internet or by all other means. g) SRF, Heales and the ILA are non profit organizations and may use the films to drive donations from the public, which will be used to advance the mission of healthy longevity. Any funds raised though the films will support scientific research, outreach and/or education programs.
- Selected Films and Winners: a) LFC has no obligation (other than as stated in these rules or on our website) to disclose any of the following information: i) identities of screeners or judges; ii) notes, feedback, or information relating to the submitted project; and/or iii) details regarding the submission review or selection process. b) LFC explicitly disclaims any liability or responsibility for any comments, notes, or opinions expressed about a submission, whether by LFC or by its volunteers. c) Winners will be announced on October 1st, 2018. The judges’ decision is final.Winners receiving cash prizes are solely responsible for payment of all applicable local, state, and federal taxes.
- Legal action: In the event of litigation the competent courts will be those of the Brussels jurisdiction in Belgium.
- Additional information: For all issues not mentioned above, the members of the jury will decide. They must decide in equity and with the same rules for all competitors.
COMPETITION LEGAL TERMS
BY SUBMITTING THE MATERIAL PARTICIPANTS AGREE:
To having read all of the rules, understood, and have complied with these rules.
To warrant that their work is original and that there are no disputes regarding the ownership of their submission.
To warrant that the submitted material does not defame or invade the rights of any person living or dead.
That failure to adhere to the competition rules and regulations will result in disqualification.
That no revisions of materials will be accepted once entry has been submitted.
That to the best of their knowledge, all the statements herein are true and correct.